OpenVZ Forum: Support » [solved] nfs mount vs. mount --bind

Home » General » Support » [solved] nfs mount vs. mount --bind

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind [message #36542 is a reply to message #36540]

Mon, 29 June 2009 16:52

freedev
Messages: 3
Registered: June 2009
Location: Milan

Junior Member

Hi maratrus,

I appreciate your support.
Support don't received by Parallels, because they say "the behavior is not related to the product", and reading your answer you confirm their response.

I checked your suggestion and it works...

anyway I receive an error when the umount is executed:

umount /vz/root/1006/usr/local/sitipersonali/disco1
umount: /vz/root/1006/usr/local/sitipersonali/disco1: not mounted

Thanks again,
Vincenzo

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[solved] nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: yahbluez on Mon, 21 January 2008 23:25
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: vaverin on Wed, 23 January 2008 05:55
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: freedev on Sun, 28 June 2009 00:08
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: maratrus on Mon, 29 June 2009 10:12
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: freedev on Mon, 29 June 2009 10:59
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: maratrus on Mon, 29 June 2009 14:57
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: freedev on Mon, 29 June 2009 16:52
		Re: nfs mount vs. mount --bind By: maratrus on Tue, 30 June 2009 04:51

Previous Topic:	Additional partition in container?
Next Topic:	memory controller and OpenVZ

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Jan 16 23:12:01 GMT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.21352 seconds