>Sam Vilain wrote:
>
>
>
>>I didn't grab uts_sem. That semaphore could be made per-uts_ns, in
>>theory. Whether anyone cares about contention that much is another
>>question.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>FWIW, the uts_sem isn't mentioned anywhere in the
>/proc/sys/kernel/osname sysctl, either. So that interface probably
>isn't safe on SMP/preempt.
>
>
No, there it is, in proc_doutsstring. I didn't parse the "doutsstring"
as "do_uts_string".