Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 09:41:29PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>> > Ok, I'll work to get these in where applicable.
>> 
>> Did this get into 2.6.27?  Or will this have to wait till .28?
>
> I haven't sent any patches to Linus yet for 2.6.27, so it hasn't gotten
> there yet.
>
> And due to the intrusiveness, and the fact that this hasn't been tested
> at all in any build tree yet, I can't in good concious submit this for
> .27 either.
>
> Part of this is my fault, I know, due to vacation and work, but also
> lots is due to the fact that the code showed up so late in the
> development cycle.

The code showed up at least by the beginning of may, and the code has
been around for 9 months or more.  I just haven't always had the
energy to retransmit every time it has gotten dropped.  The last spin
of it was very late I agree.

> I'll add it to my tree, and get it some testing in the next cycle of
> linux-next until 2.6.27 is out, and then if it's still looking good, go
> into .28.

I think that is unnecessarily precautions but reasonable.  That should at
least keep other sysfs patches from coming in and causing bit rot.

Eric

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers