On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>        I can't see a better way to support that goal and it doesn't seem
> overly ambitious to me. Just needs a somewhat specific test
> configuration for new subsystem patches to detect the deadlock issue.

Right - but all non-trivial development should be done with lockdep
enabled anyway.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers