On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:44 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:08:50PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev escreveu:
> > This seems a purism as module can't be unloaded, but though if cleanup method
> > is present it should be correct and clean all staff created.
> 
> Its the right thing to do :-) But perhaps we could have a
> inet_csk_ctl_sock_destroy() as we have inet_csk_ctl_sock_create?
> 
> And since this is not csk at all, could you please rename it to
> inet_ctl_sock_{create,destroy}()? I Agree with Vlad and Pavel that this
> would make it more clear, as SCTP is not (yet) a inet_connection_sock.

Basically, after these sockets will be moved into namespace we'll use
sk_release_kernel for them.

Can I send a rename as a follow up on Monday :) ?

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers