On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote:
>  > The change that you're referring to is allowing a cgroup to have a
>  > total memory limit for itself and all its children, and then giving
>  > that cgroup's children separate memory limits within that overall
>  > limit?
>
>  Yup. Isn't this reasonable?

Yes, sounds like a good plan.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers