Paul Menage wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Paul Menage <menage@google.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM,  <serge@hallyn.com> wrote:
>>  >
>>  >  You said the set of files belong to cgroup itself is likely to increase
>>  >  - do you have some candidates in mind?
>>
>>  Nothing concrete right now. One example that I already proposed was
>>  the "cgroup.api" file but that's shelved for now, until such time as I
>>  actually propose the binary API that it was intended to help support.
>>
> 
> One likely new file that people agreed a while ago could be useful
> would be a "procs" file, similar to "tasks", but acting (and
> reporting) on thread groups rather than individual tasks.
> 
> Paul

Yes, I remember this. This feature would be extremely useful.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers