On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Paul Menage <menage@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM,  <serge@hallyn.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >  You said the set of files belong to cgroup itself is likely to increase
>  >  - do you have some candidates in mind?
>
>  Nothing concrete right now. One example that I already proposed was
>  the "cgroup.api" file but that's shelved for now, until such time as I
>  actually propose the binary API that it was intended to help support.
>

One likely new file that people agreed a while ago could be useful
would be a "procs" file, similar to "tasks", but acting (and
reporting) on thread groups rather than individual tasks.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers