OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Users » checkpoint vs iptables-save,
Re: checkpoint vs iptables-save, [message #27916 is a reply to message #27911] Mon, 03 March 2008 08:34 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Andrey Mirkin is currently offline  Andrey Mirkin
Messages: 193
Registered: May 2006
Senior Member
Hello,

If you are not going to use iptables rules inside VE, then you can set 
IPTABLES="" in VE config.
After that iptables will not be used inside this VE and during checkpointing 
iptables-save will not be called.

BTW, more easier workaround is to install iptables-save/restore utils inside 
this VE.

Regards,
Andrey


On Sunday 02 March 2008 21:33 Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Hi,
>  recently I noticed this:
> CPT ERR: failed to exec iptables-save: -2
> CPT ERR: f76cb000,1089 :iptables-save exited with 255
>  this is fixable by such workaround: ln -s /bin/true /sbin/iptables-save
> but it probably would be nicer to skip this check if iptables-save script
> does not exist(or turn this into warning).
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Debian openvz kernel package security update policy ?
Next Topic: new 2.6.24 ovz002 release VS sysfs: duplicate filename ':0000288' can not be created
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Sep 17 11:21:30 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05070 seconds