> Why is that a conflict w.r.t resource management, isn't that more of a cgroup
> feature - task migration. We need task migration for resource management, but
> task migration is a system administrator/management function. I don't see the
> conflict, but may be I am missing something very obvious.

This is something we may want to dig. from a checkpoint/restart POV, a 
'container' acts a whole and you don't want tasks to be migrated from a 
container to another. They have to share the same container properties.  

it might be possible to solve that issue from user space or by making sure 
a set of cgroups are dedicated to a container. 

C.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers