OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC] Virtualization steps
Re: Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps [message #2626 is a reply to message #2346] Wed, 12 April 2006 08:22 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
dev is currently offline  dev
Messages: 1693
Registered: September 2005
Location: Moscow
Senior Member

Sam,

> Ok, I'll call those three VPSes fast, faster and fastest.
>
> "fast" : fill rate 1, interval 3
> "faster" : fill rate 2, interval 3
> "fastest" : fill rate 3, interval 3
>
> That all adds up to a fill rate of 6 with an interval of 3, but that is
> right because with two processors you have 2 tokens to allocate per
> jiffie. Also set the bucket size to something of the order of HZ.
>
> You can watch the processes within each vserver's priority jump up and
> down with `vtop' during testing. Also you should be able to watch the
> vserver's bucket fill and empty in /proc/virtual/XXX/sched (IIRC)
>
> I mentioned this earlier, but for the sake of the archives I'll repeat -
> if you are running with any of the buckets on empty, the scheduler is
> imbalanced and therefore not going to provide the exact distribution you
> asked for.
>
> However with a single busy loop in each vserver I'd expect the above to
> yield roughly 100% for fastest, 66% for faster and 33% for fast, within
> 5 seconds or so of starting those processes (assuming you set a bucket
> size of HZ).

Sam, what we observe is the situation, when Linux cpu scheduler spreads
2 tasks on 1st CPU and 1 task on the 2nd CPU. Std linux scheduler
doesn't do any rebalancing after that, so no plays with tokens make the
spread to be 3:2:1, since the lowest priority process gets a full 2nd
CPU (100% instead of 33% of CPU).

Where is my mistake? Can you provide a configuration where we could test
or the instuctions on how to avoid this?

Thanks,
Kirill
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH COMMIT] diff-merge-2.6.15.5-20060413
Next Topic: [PATCH] IPC: access to unmapped vmalloc area in grow_ary()
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jul 05 18:57:54 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02099 seconds