On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 20:08 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
> The logic behind EPERM, is that this failure is only for unprivileged
> callers. ENOMEM is too specifically about OOM. It could be changed
> to ENOSPC, ENFILE, EMFILE, or it could remain EPERM. What do others
> think?
Since you're patching mount anyway, maybe you could add a little pointer
for people to go check the sysctl if they get a certain error code back
from here.
-- Dave
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers