On 14/12/2007, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
>
> >
> > argh... it's a consequence of the 'current is not kept within the tree" indeed.
> >
>
> Thanks Dmitry for tracking this down.

My analysis was flawed (hmm... me was under control of Belgium beer :-)

The task in not on the runqueue (p->on_rq == 0) at the moment when
put_prev_task_fair() and set_curr_task_fair() get its turn in
sched_move_task()... so dequeue/enqueue_entity() are not triggered,
that's good.

so back to the square #0.


> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers