"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes:

> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com):
>> 
>> Currently init drops all signals including SIGKILL that are sent to it
>> that it does not ignore and does have a handler for.  Extending this to
>
> Description is crucial in this patchset, so should the above not be:
>
> 	"does not have a handler for"

Yes.  It should say "does not have a handler for."  Instead of
"does have a handler for."  Oops.  I thought that was what I wrote!

>
> ?

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers