OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC][ only for review ] memory controller bacground reclaim [0/5]
Re: [RFC][ only for review ] memory controller bacground reclaim [4/5] high/low watermark for memory [message #24000 is a reply to message #23925] Thu, 29 November 2007 19:55 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Oren Laadan is currently offline  Oren Laadan
Messages: 71
Registered: August 2007
Member
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:20:42 +0300
> Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote:
>>> +	mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
>>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&mem->res.lock, flags);
>>> +	val = res_counter_get(&mem->res, RES_LIMIT);
>>> +	if (val == (unsigned long long) LLONG_MAX) {
>>> +		low = (unsigned long long) LLONG_MAX;
>>> +		high = (unsigned long long) LLONG_MAX;
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		low = val * DEFAULT_WATERMARK_PERCENT_LOW / 100ULL;
>>> +		high = val * DEFAULT_WATERMARK_PERCENT_HIGH / 100ULL;
>> BTW, I tried to compile such a code:
>>
>> unsigned long long x, y;
>> y = ...;
>> x = y / 100ULL;
>>
>> (similar to yours) and that's what I got:
>>
>> kernel/built-in.o: In function `xxx':
>> : undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
>>
>> It looks like i386 doesn't have any support for ULL divisions.
>> It doesn't have it in CPU, and I thought that it was some-how 
>> emulated, but it is not...
>>
>> Did I miss something?
>>
> Ah, I didn't try i386...
> But I'll drop this automatic watermark adjustment part.

FYI, if you do need it, you can do long long division on i386 using
the macro "do_div()", defined in "include/asm-i386/div64.h".

Oren.

> Thanks,
> -Kame
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH net-2.6.25 2/3][IPV6] Unify and cleanup calls to addrconf_sysctl_register
Next Topic: [PATCH 0/4 net-2.6.15][UNIX] Make unix sysctls per-namespace
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Oct 09 18:16:12 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.12914 seconds