OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » How Inactive may be much greather than cached?
Re: How Inactive may be much greather than cached? [message #22008 is a reply to message #21952] Thu, 18 October 2007 14:17 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Rik van Riel is currently offline  Rik van Riel
Messages: 11
Registered: February 2006
Junior Member
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:27:00 +1000
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> Some filesystems, including I believe, ext3 with data=ordered,
> can leave orphaned pages around after they have been truncated
> out of the pagecache. These pages get left on the LRU and vmscan
> reclaims them pretty easily.

How can the VM recognize those pages?  Are they part of
the buffer cache, part of the page cache, or different?

I think it would make sense to at least try to rotate
those pages to the end of the LRU so kswapd can get rid
of them quickly.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH] Fix again the fl6_sock_lookup() fixed locking
Next Topic: [PATCH 0/4] Fix race between sk_filter reassign and sk_clone()
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Aug 22 19:51:37 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06286 seconds