KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Hi, Balbir-san
> This is a patch set against memory cgroup I have now.
> Reflected comments I got.
> 
> = 
> [1] charge refcnt fix patch     - avoid charging against a page which is being 
>                                   uncharged.
> [2] fix-err-handling patch      - remove unnecesary unlock_page_cgroup()
> [3] lock and page->cgroup patch - add helper function for charge/uncharge
> [4] avoid handling no LRU patch - makes mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() avoid
>                                   handling !Page_LRU pages.
> [5] migration fix patch         - a fix for page migration.
> [6] force reclaim patch         - add an interface for uncharging all pages in
>                                   empty cgroup.
> =
> 

Thank you very much for working on this.

> BTW, which way would you like to go ?
> 
>   1. You'll merge this set (and my future patch) to your set as
>      Memory Cgroup Maintainer and pass to Andrew Morton, later.
>      And we'll work against your tree.
>   2. I post this set to the (next) -mm. And we'll work agaisnt -mm.
> 

I think (2) is better. I don't maintain my own tree, so lets get
all the fixes and enhancements into -mm

> not as my usual patch, tested on x86-64 fake-NUMA.
> 

I'll also test these patches.

> Thanks,
> -Kame
> 


-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers