Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> 
>> Eric, pick an appropriate new non-conflicting number NOW.
> 
> Done.  My apologies for the confusion.  I thought the
> way Cedric and the IBM guys were testing someone would have
> shouted at me long before now.

Sorry Eric, that was me that should have been shouting at you. It got lost because I modified the patches I extracted from your git tree so they would apply to -mm, leaving me thinking there were no extra patches...

Further apologies for dropping the ball - it won't happen again.


Mark.
> 
>> This adds unnecessary extra work for Andrew Morton, which he has
>> enough of already.
> 
> Cedric made a good point that we will have conflicts of code
> being added to the same place in nsproxy.c and the like.  So
> I copied Andrew to give him a heads up.
> 
> I will gladly do what I can, to help.  Working against 3 trees
> development at the moment is a bit of a development challenge.
> 
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
> 

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers