OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 0/5] Kernel memory accounting container (v5)
Re: [PATCH 3/5] Switch caches notification dynamically [message #20840 is a reply to message #20791] Wed, 26 September 2007 17:30 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Christoph Lameter is currently offline  Christoph Lameter
Messages: 123
Registered: September 2006
Senior Member
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:

> > Is it necessary to mark all the existing slabs with SLAB_DEBUG? Would it 
> 
> Yup. Otherwise we can never receive a single event e.g. if we make 
> alloc/free in a loop, or similar, so that new slabs simply are not 
> created.

Right but on the other hand: If objects in these slabs are freed then your 
counters get decremented and may go negative.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH 0/3] Make tasks always have non-zero pids
Next Topic: [PATCH 2/5] make netlink processing routines semi-synchronious (inspired by rtnl) v2
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Sep 04 00:26:48 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06660 seconds