Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> The blessed way for standard caches is to use it.
> Besides, this may give this cache a better alignment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>

yes of course. thanks. 

Acked-by: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>

> ---
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> index ee68964..31351cc 100644
> --- a/kernel/nsproxy.c
> +++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> @@ -222,8 +222,7 @@ void exit_task_namespaces(struct task_st
> 
>  static int __init nsproxy_cache_init(void)
>  {
> -	nsproxy_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nsproxy", sizeof(struct nsproxy),
> -					   0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
> +	nsproxy_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(nsproxy, SLAB_PANIC);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
> 

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers