KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:34:00 +0400
> Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote:
>> Well, no container may have the ULLMAX (or what is it?) bytes
>> touched/allocated :) So I don't see any need in a special value.
>>
> Then, ULLMAX is default value of "not configured cgroup-resource-counter".
> 
> For make things clear for people(including not-hacker-users),
> can we have some definition as following ?
> --
> #define RES_COUNTER_INIFINITY 		(~0ULL)
> or some nice name

Why do we need this at all? We can simply push -1 there and be happy.

> Thanks,
> -Kame
> 

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers