OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 0/5] Fair group scheduler - various fixes
[PATCH 4/5] Add fair-user scheduler [message #20665 is a reply to message #20661] Mon, 24 September 2007 16:35 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Srivatsa Vaddagiri is currently offline  Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Messages: 241
Registered: August 2006
Senior Member
Enable user-id based fair group scheduling. This is usefull for anyone
who wants to test the group scheduler w/o having to enable
CONFIG_CGROUPS.

A separate scheduling group (i.e struct task_grp) is automatically created for 
every new user added to the system. Upon uid change for a task, it is made to 
move to the corresponding scheduling group.

A /proc tunable (/proc/root_user_share) is also provided to tune root
user's quota of cpu bandwidth.

Signed-off-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by : Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


---
 include/linux/sched.h |    4 +++
 init/Kconfig          |   13 ++++++++++++
 kernel/sched.c        |    9 ++++++++
 kernel/sched_debug.c  |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/user.c         |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 121 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6.23-rc6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -596,6 +596,10 @@ struct user_struct {
 	/* Hash table maintenance information */
 	struct hlist_node uidhash_node;
 	uid_t uid;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED
+	struct task_grp *tg;
+#endif
 };
 
 extern struct user_struct *find_user(uid_t);
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc6/init/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc6.orig/init/Kconfig
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc6/init/Kconfig
@@ -289,6 +289,19 @@ config FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
 	  This feature lets cpu scheduler recognize task groups and control cpu
 	  bandwidth allocation to such task groups.
 
+choice
+	depends on FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
+	prompt "Basis for grouping tasks"
+	default FAIR_USER_SCHED
+
+ 	config FAIR_USER_SCHED
+ 		bool "user id"
+ 		help
+ 		  This option will choose userid as the basis for grouping
+		  tasks, thus providing equal cpu bandwidth to each user.
+
+endchoice
+
 config SYSFS_DEPRECATED
 	bool "Create deprecated sysfs files"
 	default y
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -199,7 +199,12 @@ struct task_grp init_task_grp =  {
 				.cfs_rq = init_cfs_rq_p,
 				 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED
+#define INIT_TASK_GRP_LOAD	2*NICE_0_LOAD
+#else
 #define INIT_TASK_GRP_LOAD	NICE_0_LOAD
+#endif
+
 static int init_task_grp_load = INIT_TASK_GRP_LOAD;
 
 /* return group to which a task belongs */
@@ -207,7 +212,11 @@ static inline struct task_grp *task_grp(
 {
 	struct task_grp *tg;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED
+	tg = p->user->tg;
+#else
 	tg  = &init_task_grp;
+#endif
 
 	return tg;
 }
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc6/kernel/sched_debug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc6.orig/kernel/sched_debug.c
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc6/kernel/sched_debug.c
@@ -214,6 +214,49 @@ static void sysrq_sched_debug_show(void)
 	sched_debug_show(NULL, NULL);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED
+
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(root_user_share_mutex);
+
+static int
+root_user_share_read_proc(char *page, char **start, off_t off, int count,
+				 int *eof, void *data)
+{
+	int len;
+
+	len = sprintf(page, "%d\n", init_task_grp_load);
+
+	return len;
+}
+
+static int
+root_user_share_write_proc(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
+				 unsigned long count, void *data)
+{
+	unsigned long shares;
+	char kbuf[sizeof(unsigned long)+1];
+	int rc = 0;
+
+	if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buffer, sizeof(kbuf)))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	shares = simple_strtoul(kbuf, NULL, 0);
+
+	if (!shares)
+		shares = NICE_0_LOAD;
+
+	mutex_lock(&root_user_share_mutex);
+
+	init_task_grp_load = shares;
+	rc = sched_group_set_shares(&init_task_grp, shares);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&root_user_share_mutex);
+
+	return (rc < 0 ? rc : count);
+}
+
+#endif	/* CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED */
+
 static int sched_debug_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
 	return single_open(filp, sched_debug_show, NULL);
@@ -236,6 +279,15 @@ static int __init init_sched_debug_procf
 
 	pe->proc_fops = &sched_debug_fops;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED
+	pe = create_proc_entry("root_user_share", 0644, NULL);
+	if (!pe)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	pe->read_proc = root_user_share_read_proc;
+	pe->write_proc = root_user_share_write_proc;
+#endif
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc6/kernel/user.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc6.orig/kernel/user.c
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc6/kernel/user.c
@@ -50,8 +50,41 @@ struct user_struct root_user = {
 	.uid_keyring	= &root_user_keyring,
 	.session_keyring = &root_session_keyring,
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED
+	.tg		= &init_task_grp,
+#endif
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED
+static void sched_destroy_user(struct user_struct *up)
+{
+	sched_destroy_group(up->tg);
+}
+
+static int sched_create_user(struct user_struct *up)
+{
+	int rc = 0;
+
+	up->tg = sched_create_group();
+	if (IS_ERR(up->tg))
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
+static void sched_switch_user(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	sched_move_task(p);
+}
+
+#else	/* CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED */
+
+static void sched_destroy_user(struct user_struct *up) { }
+static int sched_create_user(struct user_struct *up) { return 0; }
+static void sched_switch_user(struct task_struct *p) { }
+
+#endif	/* CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED */
+
 /*
  * These routines must be called with the uidhash spinlock held!
  */
@@ -109,6 +142,7 @@ void free_uid(struct user_struct *up)
 	if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&up->__count, &uidhash_lock)) {
 		uid_hash_remove(up);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uidhash_lock, flags);
+		sched_destroy_user(up);
 		key_put(up->uid_keyring);
 		key_put(up->session_keyring);
 		kmem_cache_free(uid_cachep, up);
@@ -150,6 +184,13 @@ struct user_struct * alloc_uid(struct us
 			return NULL;
 		}
 
+		if (sched_create_user(new) < 0) {
+			key_put(new->uid_keyring);
+			key_put(new->session_keyring);
+			kmem_cache_free(uid_cachep, new);
+			return NULL;
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * Before adding this, check whether we raced
 		 * on adding the same user already..
@@ -157,6 +198,7 @@ struct user_struct * alloc_uid(struct us
 		spin_lock_irq(&uidhash_lock);
 		up = uid_hash_find(uid, hashent);
 		if (up) {
+			sched_destroy_user(new);
 			key_put(new->uid_keyring);
 			key_put(new->session_keyring);
 			kmem_cache_free(uid_cachep, new);
@@ -184,6 +226,7 @@ void switch_uid(struct user_struct *new_
 	atomic_dec(&old_user->processes);
 	switch_uid_keyring(new_user);
 	current->user = new_user;
+	sched_switch_user(current);
 
 	/*
 	 * We need to synchronize with __sigqueue_alloc()

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH RFC] capabilities: introduce per-process capability bounding set
Next Topic: [PATCH] Uninline the task_xid_nr_ns() calls
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Oct 09 23:31:02 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.13155 seconds