On 7/10/07, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp> wrote:
> hi,
>
> > diff -puN mm/memory.c~mem-control-accounting mm/memory.c
> > --- linux-2.6.22-rc6/mm/memory.c~mem-control-accounting       2007-07-05 13:45:18.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-balbir/mm/memory.c       2007-07-05 13:45:18.000000000 -0700
>
> > @@ -1731,6 +1736,9 @@ gotten:
> >               cow_user_page(new_page, old_page, address, vma);
> >       }
> >
> > +     if (mem_container_charge(new_page, mm))
> > +             goto oom;
> > +
> >       /*
> >        * Re-check the pte - we dropped the lock
> >        */
>
> it seems that the page will be leaked on error.

You mean meta_page right?

>
> > @@ -2188,6 +2196,11 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct
> >       }
> >
> >       delayacct_clear_flag(DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN);
> > +     if (mem_container_charge(page, mm)) {
> > +             ret = VM_FAULT_OOM;
> > +             goto out;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       mark_page_accessed(page);
> >       lock_page(page);
> >
>
> ditto.
>
> > @@ -2264,6 +2278,9 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct mm_s
> >               if (!page)
> >                       goto oom;
> >
> > +             if (mem_container_charge(page, mm))
> > +                     goto oom;
> > +
> >               entry = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
> >               entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
> >
>
> ditto.
>
> can you check the rest of the patch by yourself?  thanks.
>

Excellent catch! I'll review the accounting framework and post the
updated version soon

Balbir
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers