Hi, Pavel,

Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
> As far as I remember at OLS we decided to implement per-zone RLU
> lists and reuse the lru lock as well. This will remove all the 
> problems with per-container lists inconsistency.
> 

It's there in the TODO list. It is easy to implement. I can do that
in the next revision. We are re-using the LRU lock, since the
isolate_pages callback is called under the zone's LRU lock.

> Separate limits for RSS and RSS+pagecache are also a must.
> 

I remember that we discussed having one limit, but we can come up
with a configuration parameter to do it. I'll do that in the
next release.

> BTW, if you send smb. else's patches you may include a 'From: xxx'
> line into the letter to address the original author.
> 

I'll do that for the res_counters_infra patch. Although I had used
res_counter, the hooks in mm_struct earlier (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/19/12).

A lot of the code for the reclaim logic and the meta_page is yours.
Please do identify patches where you would like to see your
signed-off-by and where you think the entire patch is completely
yours.


-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers