On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:00 -0500, serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> Quoting Dave Hansen (hansendc@us.ibm.com):
> > 
> > This patch takes shrink_page_list() and splits out its main
> > loop into another function: try_to_shrink_page().  I think
> > this makes it all a bit more readable.
> 
> Haven't checked every error path yet, but it looks correct enough
> to these mm-virgin eyes.
> 
> Why is try_to_put_page_in_swap() defined in this patch?  Is that
> on purpose?

It should really go in the other one.

-- Dave

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers