On 6/9/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Would it not be simplest to have CONTAINERS as the top-level
> user-configurable item and to then have everything else depend on it?
>

Yes, OK - it can go that way around too. I guess my thought was that
people would be more interested in enabling/disabling the subsystems
themselves (cpusets, RSS, etc) than the underlying framework. But if
select has problems then it's no trouble to invert it.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers