OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Pid namespaces approaches testing results
Re: Pid namespaces approaches testing results [message #18758 is a reply to message #18733] Tue, 05 June 2007 21:16 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Cedric Le Goater is currently offline  Cedric Le Goater
Messages: 443
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
> The flat model has many optimization ways in comparison with the multilevel
> one. Like we can cache the pid value on structs and some other.
> 
> Moreover having generic level nesting sounds reasonable. Having single level
> nesting - too as all the namespace we have are single nested. But having the
> 4 level nesting sounds strange... Why 4? Why not 5? What if I don't know how
> many I will need exactly, but do know that it will be definitely more than 1?
> 
> Moreover - I have shown that we can have 1% or less performance on generic
> nesting model, why not keep it?

did you send that patchset ? is it included in the one you sent ?

sorry if i missed something :( 

C.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [PATCH 1/1] containers: implement nsproxy containers subsystem
Next Topic: [patch 0/5][RFC - ipv4/udp checkpoint/restart] dumping/restoring the IPV4/UDP sockets
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Sep 09 14:29:23 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11649 seconds