On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 15:13 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> 
> First note on that, (current == child_reaper(current)) is correct if we
> want to treat a container init as init no matter who sends the signal,
> however I contend that if a signal is sent from an ancester namespace,
> then we want to treat the task like any other task.
> 
> Could I get some confirmation or rebuttal from Suka, Eric, Dave, or
> Pavel?

I agree with this.  Signals should only be special when you're sending
them "up the chain" to _your_ init process.  We shouldn't do anything at
all special to them when one process in a set of peers just happens to
be the init for a child namespace.  

-- Dave

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers