sukadev@us.ibm.com wrote:
> Pavel Emelianov [xemul@sw.ru] wrote:
> | > Index: lx26-21-mm2/kernel/pid.c
> | > ===================================================================
> | > --- lx26-21-mm2.orig/kernel/pid.c	2007-05-22 16:59:46.000000000 -0700
> | > +++ lx26-21-mm2/kernel/pid.c	2007-05-22 17:06:48.000000000 -0700
> | > @@ -216,6 +216,10 @@ fastcall void free_pid(struct pid *pid)
> | >  	/* We can be called with write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock) held */
> | >  	unsigned long flags;
> | >  
> | > +	/* check this here to keep copy_process() cleaner */
> | > +	if (unlikely(pid == &init_struct_pid))
> | > +		return;
> | > +
> | 
> | This looks ugly to me.
> 
> I agree about the ugly part :-) but we need to distinguish
> between idle thread and normal thread at some point in do_fork().

Why not keep this as it was - pass the pid from do_fork() or
do_fork_idle(). Why is that bad?

> | That's the same as if we put 
> |    if (ns == &init_pid_ns)
> |         return;
> | in put_pid_ns() call.
> | 
> | Such small struts of their own do not introduce any noticeable
> | effect, but when we have them in many places (and on fast patsh
> | like alloc_pid()) the performance hurts...
> 
> I agree and we have been trying to keep the impact as low as possible.

In this patches - yes. But when we have many patches with sucn
"hooks" this becomes noticeable and hard to debug.

> | 
> | 
> | >  	spin_lock_irqsave(&pidmap_lock, flags);
> | >  	hlist_del_rcu(&pid->pid_chain);
> | >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pidmap_lock, flags);
> | > @@ -224,12 +228,16 @@ fastcall void free_pid(struct pid *pid)
> | >  	call_rcu(&pid->rcu, delayed_put_pid);
> | >  }
> | >  
> | > -struct pid *alloc_pid(void)
> | > +struct pid *alloc_pid(enum copy_process_type copy_src)
> | >  {
> | >  	struct pid *pid;
> | >  	enum pid_type type;
> | >  	int nr = -1;
> | >  
> | > +	/* check this here to keep copy_process() cleaner */
> | > +	if (unlikely(copy_src == COPY_IDLE_PROCESS))
> | > +		return &init_struct_pid;
> | > +
> | >  	pid = kmem_cache_alloc(pid_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> | >  	if (!pid)
> | >  		goto out;
> | > _______________________________________________
> | > Containers mailing list
> | > Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
> | > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
> | > 
> | > _______________________________________________
> | > Devel mailing list
> | > Devel@openvz.org
> | > https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> | > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers