Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:

> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 10:48:42AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> While shadow directories appear to be a good idea, the current scheme
>> of controlling their creation and destruction outside of sysfs appears
>> to be a locking and maintenance nightmare in the face of sysfs directories
>> dynamically coming and going.  Which can now occur for directories containing
>> network devices when CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is not set.
>> 
>> This patch removes everything from the initial shadow directory support
>> that allowed the shadow directory creation to be controlled at a higher
>> level.  So except for a few bits of sysfs_rename_dir everything from
>> commit b592fcfe7f06c15ec11774b5be7ce0de3aa86e73 is now gone.
>
> Can you rebase patches 2-5 on the latest -mm?  Tejun redid the whole
> sysfs internals which pretty much means that this patch series doesn't
> apply anymore :(

Groan...

I expect so.  I'm in the middle of figuring out how to make kthread_stop
successfully terminate interruptible sleeps, so I can convert the
last hold outs using kernel_thread to kthread.

Which means it will be a day or two before I can look at this, unless
I get lucky and it happens to be a trivial rebase.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers