On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 18:52 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> I'm not sure I'm following. I was under the impression that the
> conclusion of yesterdays discussion was that its probably not
> worth using rtnetlink for wireless so it will continue to use
> generic netlink exclusively, but even if that is wrong, nothing
> would prevent adding a "rtnetlink family" for wireless as well.

Oh, ok. Yeah nothing stops us from doing that, of course.

johannes

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers