Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> So how do you see us enforcing pid1's existance? Somehow keep it from
>> fully exiting, or just kill all the processes in it's namespace if it
>> exits?
what about a kthread that would be spawned when a task is cloned in an
unshared pid namespace ? This is an extra cost in term of tasks.
> Killing all other processes in the namespace when pid1 exits is what
> I implemented last time around.
this looks like a sane thing to do.
C.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers