OpenVZ Forum: Devel » [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes

Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes [message #17934 is a reply to message #17933]

Wed, 21 March 2007 16:30

ebiederm
Messages: 1354
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes:

>
> So how do you see us enforcing pid1's existance?  Somehow keep it from
> fully exiting, or just kill all the processes in it's namespace if it
> exits?

Killing all other processes in the namespace when pid1 exits is what
I implemented last time around.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Dave Hansen on Mon, 19 March 2007 22:27
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Dave Hansen on Tue, 20 March 2007 02:30
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Tue, 20 March 2007 04:07
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: serue on Tue, 20 March 2007 14:58
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Tue, 20 March 2007 02:04
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Herbert Poetzl on Fri, 23 March 2007 00:57
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Dave Hansen on Tue, 20 March 2007 15:55
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Tue, 20 March 2007 15:51
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: serue on Tue, 20 March 2007 16:00
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Tue, 20 March 2007 22:11
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: serue on Wed, 21 March 2007 14:41
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Wed, 21 March 2007 16:30
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Cedric Le Goater on Wed, 21 March 2007 16:35
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Cedric Le Goater on Tue, 20 March 2007 17:42
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Herbert Poetzl on Fri, 23 March 2007 01:02
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: serue on Mon, 26 March 2007 13:54
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Mon, 26 March 2007 17:24
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Herbert Poetzl on Mon, 26 March 2007 14:36
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Tue, 20 March 2007 22:04
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: serue on Wed, 21 March 2007 01:02
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Dave Hansen on Thu, 22 March 2007 17:07
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Thu, 22 March 2007 20:17
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: serue on Mon, 26 March 2007 14:13
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Mon, 26 March 2007 17:12
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Wed, 21 March 2007 16:57
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Cedric Le Goater on Wed, 21 March 2007 17:29
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Wed, 21 March 2007 17:42
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: serue on Wed, 21 March 2007 20:29
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Cedric Le Goater on Thu, 22 March 2007 10:44
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Thu, 22 March 2007 12:16
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Cedric Le Goater on Thu, 22 March 2007 13:14
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Herbert Poetzl on Fri, 23 March 2007 01:06
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Thu, 22 March 2007 14:16
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: serue on Thu, 22 March 2007 14:33
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Dave Hansen on Thu, 22 March 2007 17:21
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: serue on Thu, 22 March 2007 17:26
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Thu, 22 March 2007 19:40
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Herbert Poetzl on Fri, 23 March 2007 01:10
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Cedric Le Goater on Thu, 22 March 2007 14:49
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Thu, 22 March 2007 15:10
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: Dave Hansen on Mon, 26 March 2007 17:20
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Mon, 26 March 2007 17:39
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: serue on Mon, 26 March 2007 18:36
		Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes By: ebiederm on Mon, 26 March 2007 17:32

Previous Topic:	Re: Re: Linux-VServer example results for sharing vs. separate mappings ...
Next Topic:	[PATCH] Correct accept(2) recovery after sock_attach_fd()

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Sep 05 17:03:17 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08255 seconds