OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes
Re: [RFC][PATCH] Do not set /proc inode->pid for non-pid-related inodes [message #17900 is a reply to message #17884] Tue, 20 March 2007 22:04 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
ebiederm is currently offline  ebiederm
Messages: 1354
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
Dave Hansen <hansendc@us.ibm.com> writes:

> On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 09:51 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Outlive is the wrong concept.  Ideally we want something that will
>> live as long as there are processes in the pid_ns. 
>
> How about they just live as long as there is a mount?  Now that we _can_
> have multiple superblocks and meaningful vfsmounts, I think it's time to
> make it act like a normal filesystem.  

Agreed.

My concern is that the mount will outlive the pid namespace.  In which
case we need something that is safe to test when the pid namespace goes
away.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Re: Linux-VServer example results for sharing vs. separate mappings ...
Next Topic: [PATCH] Correct accept(2) recovery after sock_attach_fd()
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Sep 05 08:46:33 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.09522 seconds