OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 0/59] Cleanup sysctl
Re: [PATCH 49/59] sysctl: Move init_irq_proc into init/main where it belongs [message #17400 is a reply to message #17198] Sat, 27 January 2007 10:51 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Andrew Morton is currently offline  Andrew Morton
Messages: 127
Registered: December 2005
Senior Member
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:39:54 -0700
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:

> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> - unquoted
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> ---
>  init/main.c     |    3 +++
>  kernel/sysctl.c |    3 ---
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 8b4a7d7..8af5c6e 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -691,6 +691,9 @@ static void __init do_basic_setup(void)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
>  	sysctl_init();
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> +	init_irq_proc();
> +#endif
>  
>  	do_initcalls();
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index 600b333..7420761 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -1172,8 +1172,6 @@ static ctl_table dev_table[] = {
>  	{ .ctl_name = 0 }
>  };
>  
> -extern void init_irq_proc (void);
> -
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sysctl_lock);
>  
>  /* called under sysctl_lock */
> @@ -1219,7 +1217,6 @@ void __init sysctl_init(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
>  	register_proc_table(root_table, proc_sys_root, &root_table_header);
> -	init_irq_proc();
>  #endif
>  }

sparc64:

init/main.c: In function `do_basic_setup':
init/main.c:707: warning: implicit declaration of function `init_irq_proc'

I couldn't be bothered working out how init/main.c is supposed to get at
its declaration of init_irq_proc().  It's not allowed to include
linux/irq.h.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: gentoo baselayout 1.13 openvz modifications
Next Topic: [PATCH] :EXT[3, 4] jbd layer function called instead of fs specific one
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Aug 31 22:33:21 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05729 seconds