OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 0/59] Cleanup sysctl
[PATCH 3/59] sysctl: sunrpc Remove unnecessary insert_at_head flag [message #17152 is a reply to message #17149] Tue, 16 January 2007 16:39 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
ebiederm is currently offline  ebiederm
Messages: 1354
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> - unquoted

Because the sunrpc sysctls don't conflict with any other
sysctls the setting the insert at head flag to register_sysctl
has no semantic meaning.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
 net/sunrpc/sysctl.c   |    2 +-
 net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/sysctl.c b/net/sunrpc/sysctl.c
index 82b2752..3852689 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/sysctl.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/sysctl.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ void
 rpc_register_sysctl(void)
 {
 	if (!sunrpc_table_header) {
-		sunrpc_table_header = register_sysctl_table(sunrpc_table, 1);
+		sunrpc_table_header = register_sysctl_table(sunrpc_table, 0);
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 		if (sunrpc_table[0].de)
 			sunrpc_table[0].de->owner = THIS_MODULE;
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
index 49cabff..98d1af9 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -1630,7 +1630,7 @@ int init_socket_xprt(void)
 {
 #ifdef RPC_DEBUG
 	if (!sunrpc_table_header) {
-		sunrpc_table_header = register_sysctl_table(sunrpc_table, 1);
+		sunrpc_table_header = register_sysctl_table(sunrpc_table, 0);
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 		if (sunrpc_table[0].de)
 			sunrpc_table[0].de->owner = THIS_MODULE;
-- 
1.4.4.1.g278f

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: gentoo baselayout 1.13 openvz modifications
Next Topic: [PATCH] :EXT[3, 4] jbd layer function called instead of fs specific one
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Sep 18 18:46:25 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05880 seconds