"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes:
>
> Or we could go ahead and fully implement it in procfs.  As you'd said
> earlier, that really maps best into what we want.  Containerfs was
> just much simpler and quicker to implement for demonstrating the semantics.

That sounds like the safe bet.  I'm keeping the other idea around
in case we find something that needs a little more power :)

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers