> Well I just took a quick look through them to be certain
> and I don't see anything that would.  Even inside of the guts of
> request firmware.  So I'm pretty certain that SIGTERM was something
> originally copied from another kernel_thread implementation and
> wound up being dead code.

Not at all, it was all written from scratch (so now you know who to
blame :) ).  And the signal *is* used, as explained in my reply to
your original email.

Ciao,

Duncan.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers