clg@fr.ibm.com writes:

> From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
>
> This patch adds a hashtable of nsproxy using the nsproxy as a key. 
> init_nsproxy is hashed at init with key 0. This is considered to be 
> the 'host' nsproxy.

NAK.  Which namespace do these ids live in?

It sounds like you are setting up to make the 'host' nsproxy special
and have special rules.  That also sounds wrong.

Even letting the concept of nsproxy escape to user space sounds wrong.
nsproxy is an internal space optimization.  It's not struct container
and I don't think we want it to become that.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers