OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [patch -mm 00/17] new namespaces and related syscalls
Re: [patch -mm 08/17] nsproxy: add hashtable [message #16846 is a reply to message #16823] Thu, 07 December 2006 09:06 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Cedric Le Goater is currently offline  Cedric Le Goater
Messages: 443
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
>> This patch adds a hashtable of nsproxy using the nsproxy as a key.
>> init_nsproxy is hashed at init with key 0. This is considered to be
>> the 'host' nsproxy.
> 
> hmm? how is that going to work?
> 
> I mean, a simple clone() call (on the host) will
> change the nsproxy and spawn new ones, but that
> doesn't mean that the process has left the 'host'
> it just means that some namespace is not shared
> with the 'other' processes ...

right. the new nsproxy is built with the new and old
namespaces and the id can be identify it.

nsproxy 0 is init_nsproxy which aggregates all the 
initial namespaces. 

C.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: seems to be a flaw in cfq
Next Topic: [PATCH] compat offsets size change
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Oct 06 14:40:48 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04601 seconds