Quoting Herbert Poetzl (herbert@13thfloor.at):
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 12:29:05PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Herbert Poetzl (herbert@13thfloor.at):
> > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:05:30PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> > > > BTW...
> > > > 
> > > > > --- 2.6.18-rc4-mm3.orig/include/linux/sched.h
> > > > > +++ 2.6.18-rc4-mm3/include/linux/sched.h
> > > > > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> > > > >  #define CLONE_STOPPED		0x02000000	/* Start in stopped state */
> > > > >  #define CLONE_NEWUTS		0x04000000	/* New utsname group? */
> > > > >  #define CLONE_NEWIPC		0x08000000	/* New ipcs */
> > > > > +#define CLONE_NEWUSER		0x10000000	/* New user */
> > > > we have place for 3 namespaces more only.
> > > > Does anyone have a plan what to do then?
> > > 
> > > what about having a new clone syscall with 32 or 
> > > better 64 bits reserved for namespace stuff, and
> > > only put basic/generic namespaces or even aggregate
> > > flags into the existing clone interface?
> > > 
> > > something like: uts+ipc+user -> CLONE_NEWXYZ
> > > but CLONE2_NEWUTS, CLONE2_NEWIPC, CLONE2_NEWUSER
> > > 
> > > best,
> > > Herbert
> > > 
> > > PS: what happened to the idea of forwarding
> > > this whole stuff to _both_ mailing lists?
> > > as far as I can tell we are adding those lists
> > > every now and then to the CC, could that be
> > > addressed soon?
> > 
> > My understanding is that both openvz and vserver should
> > be subscribed to the containers list.
> > 
> > Is that not the case?
> 
> not that I would know of .. but maybe our list is
> misconfigured, you'll never know, please double
> check on your side too

The vserver list is in fact subscribed.  Do you have some logs you can
check to see whether container@lists.osdl.org messages are being dropped
for some reason?

thanks,
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers