Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:

> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:42:10PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> The problem by remember a user space process by it's pid it is
>> possible that the process will exit, pid wrap around will occur and a
>> different process will appear in it's place.  Holding a reference
>> to a struct pid avoid that problem, and paves the way
>> for implementing a pid namespace.
>> 
>> Also since usb is the only user of kill_proc_info_as_uid
>> rename kill_proc_info_as_uid to kill_pid_info_as_uid
>> and have the new version take a struct pid.
>> 
>> This patch is against 2.6.18-rc6-mm1.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Do you want me to take this in my tree, or will you be going through
> Andrew, like your other, related pid stuff?  If through Andrew, please
> feel free to add:
> 	Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

Sure.  I think going through Andrew makes sense.  As I probably have
a helper function or two in Andrews tree that hasn't hit wider distribution.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers