Quoting Herbert Poetzl (herbert@13thfloor.at):
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:05:30PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> > BTW...
> > 
> > > --- 2.6.18-rc4-mm3.orig/include/linux/sched.h
> > > +++ 2.6.18-rc4-mm3/include/linux/sched.h
> > > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> > >  #define CLONE_STOPPED		0x02000000	/* Start in stopped state */
> > >  #define CLONE_NEWUTS		0x04000000	/* New utsname group? */
> > >  #define CLONE_NEWIPC		0x08000000	/* New ipcs */
> > > +#define CLONE_NEWUSER		0x10000000	/* New user */
> > we have place for 3 namespaces more only.
> > Does anyone have a plan what to do then?
> 
> what about having a new clone syscall with 32 or 
> better 64 bits reserved for namespace stuff, and
> only put basic/generic namespaces or even aggregate
> flags into the existing clone interface?
> 
> something like: uts+ipc+user -> CLONE_NEWXYZ
> but CLONE2_NEWUTS, CLONE2_NEWIPC, CLONE2_NEWUSER
> 
> best,
> Herbert
> 
> PS: what happened to the idea of forwarding
> this whole stuff to _both_ mailing lists?
> as far as I can tell we are adding those lists
> every now and then to the CC, could that be
> addressed soon?

My understanding is that both openvz and vserver should
be subscribed to the containers list.

Is that not the case?

-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers