Re: [PATCH] diskquota: 32bit quota tools on 64bit architectures [message #14135 is a reply to message #7646] |
Fri, 15 June 2007 11:00 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/ovz3/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to previous message](/theme/ovz3/images/down.png) |
Vasily Tarasov
Messages: 1345 Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:43 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > --- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig 2007-06-14 15:55:26.000000000 +0400
> > > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c 2007-06-14 19:50:13.000000000 +0400
> > ...
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || defined(CONFIG_IA64)
> > > +/*
> > > + * This code works only for 32 bit quota tools over 64 bit OS (x86_64, ia64)
> > > + * and is necessary due to alignment problems.
> > > + */
> >
> > The #ifdef looks way too arch-specific. And isn't there a shared
> > compat.c module somewhere that this should go into?
> >
>
> Only x86_64 and ia64 have this particular problem, the other architectures,
> and hopefully all future 64 bit platforms with 32 bit user space use
> the same alignment rules in elf32 and elf64.
>
> Still, the patch should be converted to use the compat_u64 type and not
> add an 'attribute((packed))' so that you _can_ use the same code on all
> architectures. See my 'Introduce compat_u64 and compat_s64 types' patch
> that I just posted in another thread.
>
> Arnd <><
>
Agree, it'll be the most clean solution.
Is it ok, if I'll send a patch against (current kernel + Arnd's patch)?
Thanks,
Vasily
|
|
|