OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers
Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers [message #13761 is a reply to message #13758] Mon, 04 June 2007 20:41 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
serue is currently offline  serue
Messages: 750
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
Quoting Paul Menage (menage@google.com):
> On 6/4/07, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> >Yup - early in the life of cpusets, a created cpuset inherited the cpus
> >and mems of its parent. But that broke the exclusive property big
> >time. You will recall that a cpu_exclusive or mem_exclusive cpuset
> >cannot overlap the cpus or memory, respectively, of any of its sibling
> >cpusets.
> >
>
> Maybe we could make it a per-cpuset option whether children should
> inherit mems/cpus or not?

The values can be changed after the cpuset is populated, right? So
really these are just defaults? Would it then make sense to just
default to (parent_set - sibling_exclusive_set) for a new sibling's
value?

An option is fine with me, but without such an option at all, cpusets
could not be applied to namespaces...

thanks,
-serge
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [RFD] L2 Network namespace infrastructure
Next Topic: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Containers: Integrated RSS and pagecache control v5
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Oct 16 04:55:44 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06310 seconds