OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [PATCH 0/13] Pid namespaces (OpenVZ view)
Re: [PATCH 0/13] Pid namespaces (OpenVZ view) [message #13317 is a reply to message #13284] Thu, 24 May 2007 16:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
ebiederm is currently offline  ebiederm
Messages: 1354
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org> writes:

> That's how OpenVZ sees the pid namespaces.
>
> The main idea is that kernel keeps operating with tasks pid
> as it did before, but each task obtains one more pid for each
> pid type - the virtual pid. When putting the pid to user or
> getting the pid from it kernel operates with the virtual ones.

Just a quick reaction.

- I would very much like to see a minimum of 3 levels of pids,
being supported. Otherwise it is easy to overlook some of the
cases that are required to properly support nesting, which long
terms seems important.

- Semantically fork is easier then unshare. Unshare can mean
a lot of things, and it is easy to pick a meaning that has weird
side effects. Your implementation has a serious problem in that you
change the value of getpid() at runtime. Glibc does not know how to
cope with the value of getpid() changing.

Eric
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add group fairness to CFS
Next Topic: [RFC][PATCH 0/16] Enable cloning of pid namespace
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Oct 10 06:49:14 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.17215 seconds