OpenVZ Forum


Home » General » Support » [SOLVED] Routing problem in VE
Re: Routing problem in VE [message #13067 is a reply to message #13046] Fri, 18 May 2007 10:52 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
wilf is currently offline  wilf
Messages: 30
Registered: January 2007
Location: UK
Member
Hi Morik,

BASE-INSTANCE ~ # traceroute 10.1.4.191
traceroute to 10.1.4.191 (10.1.4.191), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
 1  10.0.254.2 (10.0.254.2)  0.204 ms  0.181 ms  0.182 ms
 2  10.1.4.191 (10.1.4.191)  0.493 ms  0.453 ms  0.477 ms
BASE-INSTANCE ~ # traceroute 10.1.4.192
traceroute to 10.1.4.192 (10.1.4.192), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
 1  10.0.254.2 (10.0.254.2)  0.267 ms  0.183 ms  0.186 ms
 2  10.1.4.192 (10.1.4.192)  0.545 ms  0.444 ms  0.449 ms
BASE-INSTANCE ~ # traceroute 10.1.1.191
traceroute to 10.1.1.191 (10.1.1.191), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
 1  10.0.254.2 (10.0.254.2)  0.249 ms  0.183 ms  0.181 ms
 2  10.0.254.3 (10.0.254.3)  0.309 ms  0.326 ms  0.319 ms
 3  10.1.1.191 (10.1.1.191)  0.820 ms  0.659 ms  0.525 ms
BASE-INSTANCE ~ # traceroute 10.1.1.192
traceroute to 10.1.1.192 (10.1.1.192), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
 1  10.0.254.2 (10.0.254.2)  0.251 ms  0.183 ms  0.180 ms
 2  10.0.254.3 (10.0.254.3)  0.394 ms  0.341 ms  0.316 ms
 3  10.1.1.192 (10.1.1.192)  0.808 ms  0.538 ms  0.603 ms
BASE-INSTANCE ~ # traceroute 10.200.6.1
traceroute to 10.200.6.1 (10.200.6.1), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
 1  10.0.254.2 (10.0.254.2)  0.216 ms  0.185 ms  0.177 ms
 2  10.0.254.3 (10.0.254.3)  0.382 ms  0.316 ms  0.345 ms
 3  10.1.253.74 (10.1.253.74)  0.501 ms  0.577 ms  0.485 ms
 4  * * *

BASE-INSTANCE ~ # ping !$
ping 10.200.6.1
PING 10.200.6.1 (10.200.6.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.200.6.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=0.735 ms
From 10.0.254.2: icmp_seq=2 Redirect Network(New nexthop: 10.0.254.3)
64 bytes from 10.200.6.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=0.792 ms

--- 10.200.6.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.735/0.763/0.792/0.039 ms

As you can see, it all works OK from the base instance. One oddity is that although it can ping 10.200.6.1, traceroute never completes.
BASE-INSTANCE ~ # vzctl enter 201
entered into VE 201
VE-LIVE / #  traceroute 10.1.4.191
traceroute to east (10.1.4.191), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
 1  10.0.253.72 (10.0.253.72)  0.048 ms  0.030 ms  0.012 ms
 2  * * *
 3  * *
VE-LIVE / #  traceroute 10.1.4.192
traceroute to 10.1.4.192 (10.1.4.192), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
 1  10.0.253.72 (10.0.253.72)  0.037 ms  0.016 ms  0.011 ms
 2  * * *
 3  * *
VE-LIVE / # traceroute 10.1.1.191
traceroute to central (10.1.1.191), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
 1  10.0.253.72 (10.0.253.72)  0.038 ms  0.023 ms  0.012 ms
 2  10.0.254.3 (10.0.254.3)  0.391 ms  0.312 ms  0.327 ms
 3  centralexchange (10.1.1.191)  0.816 ms  0.611 ms  0.647 ms
VE-LIVE / # traceroute 10.1.1.192
traceroute to 10.1.1.192 (10.1.1.192), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
 1  10.0.253.72 (10.0.253.72)  0.026 ms  0.015 ms  0.011 ms
 2  10.0.254.3 (10.0.254.3)  0.425 ms  0.285 ms  0.448 ms
 3  10.1.1.192 (10.1.1.192)  0.651 ms  0.638 ms  0.647 ms
VE-LIVE / # traceroute 10.200.6.1
traceroute to 10.200.6.1 (10.200.6.1), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
 1  10.0.253.72 (10.0.253.72)  0.028 ms  0.021 ms  0.011 ms
 2  10.0.254.3 (10.0.254.3)  0.456 ms  0.278 ms  0.327 ms
 3  10.1.253.74 (10.1.253.74)  0.649 ms  0.485 ms  0.486 ms
 4  * * *
 5  * *
VE-LIVE / # ping !$
ping 10.200.6.1
PING 10.200.6.1 (10.200.6.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.200.6.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=252 time=0.709 ms
From 10.0.254.2: icmp_seq=2 Redirect Network(New nexthop: 10.0.254.3)
64 bytes from 10.200.6.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=252 time=0.872 ms

--- 10.200.6.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.709/0.790/0.872/0.086 ms


10.1.4.191 just isn't visible at all. I find it strange that the instance get the location of the servers (central and east), but that info doesn't appear in teh base-instance. Am I confused? Yup.

Thanks again for you time,

Best Regards, Paul.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: *SOLVED* Is OpenVZ in Parallels vm known to work?
Next Topic: Problem starting VPS services (mysql)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Oct 18 11:05:54 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04917 seconds