Home » Mailing lists » Users » openvz and SuSE
| Re: openvz and SuSE [message #1209 is a reply to message #1202] |
Fri, 03 February 2006 12:38   |
Daniel Bauer
Messages: 37
Registered: February 2006
|
Member |
|
|
From: "Mishin Dmitry" <dim@sw.ru>
> On Friday 03 February 2006 13:40, Daniel Bauer wrote:
>> From: "Mishin Dmitry" <dim@sw.ru>
>>
>> >> I've three nics, but only one venet0.
>> >> i.e. eth0 is connected to intranet for use of VPS
>> >> (10.x.x.x)
>> >> eth1 is connected to internet for use of VPS
>> >> (20.x.x.x)
>> >> eth2 s connected to intranet only for use of the Host
>> >> (30.x.x.x)
>> >>
>> >> I'd like to use:
>> >> VPS1: intranet (eth0)
>> >> VPS2: internet (eth1)
>> >> VPS3: intranet (eth0) + internet (eth1)
>> >>
>> >> On the host (eth2) I don't want to have an IP of the intranet or
>> >> internet, the nics should be used for the VPS.
>> >>
>> >> As I understand it's not possible to share a real nic with Host
>> >> and
>> >> diff. VPS, so howto setup this configuration?
>> >
>> > You should assign IP from intranet to VPS1, IP for internet to VPS2
>> > and both
>> > such IPs to VPS3.
>>
>> Sorry that doesn't work here if you don't have a IP on the host.
>> i.e.
>> Host:
>> eth0 10.1.0.1/255.255.255.0
>> eth1 10.2.0.1/255.255.255.0*
>>
>> VPS1:
>> venet0:0 10.3.0.2/255.255.255.255
>>
>> VPS2:
>> venet0:0 10.4.0.3/255.255.255.255*
>>
>> VPS3:
>> venet0:0 10.3.0.4/255.255.255.255
>> venet0:1 10.4.0.4/255.255.255.255*
>>
>> * not used in this test
>>
>> a Client with IP 10.1.0.100 could ping the host
>> a Client with IP 10.3.0.100 could ping nothing
>>
>> If I set the host to 10.3.0.1 then I could ping the Host, VPS1 and
>> VPS3.
>> So it seems to me that is necessary to have an IP on the host from
>> the
>> same subnet.
> You are right.
>>
>> I see that when I start the VPS a new route for each IP, maybe this
>> is
>> the problem, is it not better to bridge the adapters between Host and
>> VPS?
> venet works on IP level, not Ethernet. So, bridging is impossible for
> now.
is it possible to take another way to work on Ethernet level, because I
don't want a official IP for the host.
1. security
2. no need for
3. one official IP less for each block
Daniel
|
|
|
|
 |
|
openvz and SuSE
|
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
By: kir on Wed, 01 February 2006 13:43 |
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
|
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
By: kir on Wed, 01 February 2006 17:00 |
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
|
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
By: kir on Thu, 02 February 2006 17:06 |
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
|
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
|
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
By: kir on Fri, 03 February 2006 09:20 |
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
|
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
By: kir on Fri, 03 February 2006 11:04 |
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
|
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
By: kir on Fri, 03 February 2006 12:48 |
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
By: dim on Fri, 03 February 2006 09:30 |
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
|
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
By: dim on Fri, 03 February 2006 10:52 |
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
|
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
By: dim on Fri, 03 February 2006 13:00 |
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
|
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
By: dim on Fri, 03 February 2006 15:03 |
|
|
Re: openvz and SuSE
By: jbond007 on Wed, 08 February 2006 15:43 |
|
|
Re: Re: openvz and SuSE
By: dim on Wed, 08 February 2006 15:52 |
|
|
Re: Re: openvz and SuSE
By: jbond007 on Wed, 08 February 2006 17:07 |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: openvz and SuSE
By: dim on Thu, 09 February 2006 09:23 |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: openvz and SuSE
By: jbond007 on Thu, 16 February 2006 03:11 |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: openvz and SuSE
By: dev on Thu, 16 February 2006 06:38 |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: openvz and SuSE
By: jbond007 on Thu, 16 February 2006 14:50 |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: openvz and SuSE
By: dev on Fri, 17 February 2006 06:17 |
|
|
Re: Re: openvz and SuSE
|
|
|
Re: Re: openvz and SuSE
By: jbond007 on Thu, 09 February 2006 01:47 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Jul 15 07:35:41 GMT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02318 seconds
|
OpenVZ Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
