OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » Re: Re: [patch 05/10] add "permit user mounts in new namespace" clone flag
Re: Re: [patch 05/10] add "permit user mounts in new namespace" clone flag [message #12063 is a reply to message #12038] Mon, 16 April 2007 17:14 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Ram Pai is currently offline  Ram Pai
Messages: 15
Registered: April 2007
Junior Member
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 11:56 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > > Also for bind-mount and remount operations the flag has to be propagated
> > > > down its propagation tree. Otherwise a unpriviledged mount in a shared
> > > > mount wont get reflected in its peers and slaves, leading to unidentical
> > > > shared-subtrees.
> > >
> > > That's an interesting question. Do we want shared mounts to be
> > > totally identical, including mnt_flags? It doesn't look as if
> > > do_remount() guarantees that currently.
> >
> > Depends on the semantics of each of the flags. Some flags like of the
> > read/write flag, would not interfere with the propagation semantics
> > AFAICT. But this one certainly seems to interfere.
>
> That depends. Current patches check the "unprivileged submounts
> allowed under this mount" flag only on the requested mount and not on
> the propagated mounts. Do you see a problem with this?

Don't see a problem if the flag is propagated to all peers and slave
mounts.

If not, I see a problem. What if the propagated mount has its flag set
to not do un-priviledged mounts, whereas the requested mount has it
allowed?

RP



>
> Miklos
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [patch 00/10] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall (v3)
Next Topic: [PATCH] Introduce a handy list_first_entry macro (v2)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Aug 30 04:44:04 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05685 seconds