OpenVZ Forum


Home » Mailing lists » Devel » [RFC][PATCH] VPIDs: Virtualization of PIDs (OpenVZ approach)
[RFC][PATCH 7/7] VPIDs: required VPS interface for VPIDs [message #1160 is a reply to message #1153] Thu, 02 February 2006 16:32 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Kirill Korotaev is currently offline  Kirill Korotaev
Messages: 137
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
This patch adds small VPS/containers interface which is used by VPIDs

Kirill

--- ./include/linux/sched.h.vps_info 2006-02-02 14:58:53.000000000 +0300
+++ ./include/linux/sched.h 2006-02-02 18:38:15.134903248 +0300
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/nodemask.h>
+#include <linux/vps_info.h>

#include <asm/system.h>
#include <asm/semaphore.h>
--- ./include/linux/vps_info.h.vps_info 2006-02-02 18:12:49.500834880 +0300
+++ ./include/linux/vps_info.h 2006-02-02 18:55:41.137886624 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+#ifndef __VPS_INFO_H_
+#define __VPS_INFO_H_
+
+#include <linux/config.h>
+
+struct vps_common_info {
+ int id;
+ struct task_struct *init_task;
+ int is_sparse;
+ atomic_t counter;
+ atomic_t pcounter;
+};
+
+typedef struct vps_common_info *vps_info_t;
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_VPS
+extern struct vps_common_info super_vps_info;
+
+#define super_vps() (&super_vps_info)
+#define current_vps() (super_vps())
+#define task_vps(t) (super_vps())
+#define inside_vps() (0)
+#define task_inside_vps(t) (0)
+#define vps_stop(vps) do { } while (0)
+#define vps_free(vps) do { } while (0)
+#endif
+
+#define sparse_vpid(vps) ((vps)->is_sparse)
+#define set_sparse_vpid(vps) do { (vps)->is_sparse = 1; } while (0)
+
+#define vps_get(vps) atomic_inc(&(vps)->counter)
+#define vps_put(vps) do { \
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&(vps)->counter)) \
+ vps_free(vps); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define vps_task_add(vps) atomic_inc(&(vps)->pcounter)
+#define vps_task_del(vps) do { \
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&(vps)->pcounter)) \
+ vps_stop(vps); \
+ } while (0)
+#define get_vps_tasks_num(vps) atomic_read(&(vps)->pcounter)
+
+#endif
--- ./init/main.c.vps_info 2006-02-02 14:15:35.000000000 +0300
+++ ./init/main.c 2006-02-02 18:40:36.592398440 +0300
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
#include <linux/rmap.h>
#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
#include <linux/key.h>
+#include <linux/vps_info.h>

#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/bugs.h>
@@ -434,6 +435,14 @@ void __init parse_early_param(void)
done = 1;
}

+struct vps_common_info super_vps_info = {
+ .id = 0,
+ .init_task = &init_task,
+ .counter = ATOMIC_INIT(1),
+ .pcounter = ATOMIC_INIT(1), /* init_task */
+ .is_sparse = 0,
+};
+
/*
* Activate the first processor.
*/
--- ./kernel/exit.c.vps_info 2006-02-02 14:33:58.000000000 +0300
+++ ./kernel/exit.c 2006-02-02 18:33:10.953145904 +0300
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <linux/cn_proc.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/vps_info.h>

#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
@@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ repeat:
spin_unlock(&p->proc_lock);
proc_pid_flush(proc_dentry);
release_thread(p);
+ vps_task_del(task_vps(p));
put_task_struct(p);

p = leader;
--- ./kernel/fork.c.vps_info 2006-02-02 14:41:40.000000000 +0300
+++ ./kernel/fork.c 2006-02-02 18:32:07.910729808 +0300
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include <linux/rmap.h>
#include <linux/acct.h>
#include <linux/cn_proc.h>
+#include <linux/vps_info.h>

#include <asm/pgtable.h>
#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
@@ -1139,6 +1140,7 @@ static task_t *copy_process(unsigned lon
p->ioprio = current->ioprio;

SET_LINKS(p);
+ vps_task_add(task_vps(p));
if (unlikely(p->ptrace & PT_PTRACED))
__ptrace_link(p, current->parent);

--- ./kernel/pid.c.vps_info 2006-02-02 14:58:34.000000000 +0300
+++ ./kernel/pid.c 2006-02-02 18:54:25.506384360 +0300
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/bootmem.h>
#include <linux/hash.h>
+#include <linux/vps_info.h>

#ifdef CONFIG_VIRTUAL_PIDS
static void __free_vpid(int vpid, struct task_struct *ve_tsk);
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: vzmemcheck displays wrong values?
Next Topic: openvz + ipv6
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Aug 30 05:49:35 GMT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06621 seconds